Orlando Pirates’ attacking approach has brought plenty of excitement, but it has also raised an important tactical question: would the Buccaneers benefit from switching from an 8+8 double pivot to a more balanced 6+8 midfield?
Coach Wadu’s preference for the 8+8 combination is understandable. The system is designed to give Pirates greater control of possession, keep more players higher up the pitch and ensure that the No. 10s receive a consistent supply of the ball. With two midfielders capable of moving forward, Pirates can maintain pressure and create numerical advantages in the attacking third.
However, there is another side to the equation.
Pirates’ full-backs are often encouraged to push forward and contribute to attacks. While this adds another dimension going forward, it can leave significant spaces behind when possession is lost. With both full-backs high and two No. 8s also looking to advance, the defensive midfield area can become vulnerable during transitions.
This is where a traditional No. 6 could make a major difference.
A defensive midfielder would provide an extra layer of protection in front of the centre-backs, allowing the full-backs and No. 8 to attack with greater freedom. The No. 6 could also help stop counter-attacks before they develop, while maintaining the team’s ability to dominate possession.
A potential 6+8 combination featuring Mthiyane and Makodobi, for example, could offer a blend of defensive security and creativity. Another option could be Makhaula alongside Mbatha, depending on the tactical demands of the opposition.
The key would be finding the right balance without sacrificing Pirates’ attacking identity.
The Buccaneers do not necessarily need to abandon their attacking philosophy. Instead, a 6+8 midfield could give them the defensive foundation required to play that football more consistently and with less risk.
Ultimately, the question is simple: does Pirates’ attacking football need an extra layer of protection?
🏴☠️ Buccaneers, would you prefer an 8+8 or a 6+8 midfield?

Leave a Reply